Here
are the notes from the “Elephant in the Room” activity regarding our
rubric work. These notes have also been emailed to our Network coach,
Jenny Pieratt. She is reviewing them and will be building a strategy with Peter & Christie
regarding next steps this afternoon (Friday, 9/7).
Concerns documented on post its:
“Poorly articulated context/history...are we reinventing the New Tech Network Rubric wheel?”
“I’d
like the Tech & Info rubric to be more specific and aligned across
the columns. I’d also like to be sure we retain flexibility in these
areas: allowing teachers to spread their own point values across
columns, encouraging teachers to modify language to fit specific
assignments.”
“That I’m only allowed to talk about rubrics.”
“While
well intentioned, our push for school-wide rubrics is destined to
become another impossible to implement task loaded onto already
over-burdened teachers. There is not enough time in the day as it is,
so this initiative is doomed to fail and the rubrics will die in an
archive.”
“Inordinate
amount of collaboration time spend on rubrics last semester when we
have many pressing priorities/needs that could be addressed in this
time.”
“Let’s
pilot what we have, revisit in spring. They (rubrics) still feel too
complicated & unnecessarily rigorous. We need to calibrate with
student models (their work).”
“I
heard a lot of different challenges faced but not much about the
rubrics. On the contrary, I heard that they are so easy to use, that it
is a wonder why anyone has any problem at all!”
“Why did we spend our time deciding what to include & then allow additions & deletions?”
“Finish
Process!! If rubric is not ‘approved’...tough! Go with what we have
and come back to it in May. Allow sm group to complete ‘touch ups’ if
needed. But please move on.”
“Can we move forward w/labeling, numbering, and weighting? Not sure I see value in going backwards.”
“How
can we determine when students will learn which parts of the rubric?
If the goal is for students to learn the entire rubric throughout their
time here.”
“How do we make sure that all students are exposed to and gain ability in each rubric category and each rubric item?”
“I don’t know where to find the final revision of the rubrics.” ← Final rubrics can be found in staff handbook under “Assessment and Learning Outcomes”.
“We
are working to create a common rubric, but we are working from varied
philosophies, consequently, the tension between quantification and
qualification is muddling the purpose and value (e.g. number ranges make
students aim for a score rather than rich learning).”
“Not
done - headers and number values. Accountability for using them.
Fitting the subject matter. Needed clearer understanding.”
“Give teachers more support in the implementation process.”
“Con:
People’s fear of change. Pro: Lots of work has been done to create
these with lots of opportunity for input - both quantitative and
qualitative. You create your own curricular rubric - lets try them see
what issues come up & reevaluate after a semester.”
“Lack up buy in on the work that we already did.”
“Worried about lack of follow through on consensus agreements.”
No comments:
Post a Comment